Xeon E5-1603 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 28 Watt
19.44
+796%
Xeon E5-1603
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.17

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Xeon E5-1603 by a whopping 796% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3041896
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency34.181.58
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)no data
Release dateJuly 2024 (recently)1 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHzno data
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache16 MB10 MB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size233 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C64 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.6V - 1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data375 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data31.4 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.44
+796%
Xeon E5-1603 2.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31139
+796%
Xeon E5-1603 3475

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 2.17
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 795.9% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 364.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1603 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-1603 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 15 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 23 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon E5-1603, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.