Celeron N5095 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68
+666%
Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 666% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2911744
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)Intel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency34.4716.20
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.9 GHz
L2 cache12 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache24 MB4 MB
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68
+666%
Celeron N5095 2.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255
+667%
Celeron N5095 4076

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 3334
+816%
Celeron N5095 364

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 301
+184%
Celeron N5095 106

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 14728
+626%
Celeron N5095 2028

Blender(-)

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 159
Celeron N5095 1547
+873%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 2121
+226%
Celeron N5095 651

7-Zip Single

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 5856
+88.9%
Celeron N5095 3100

7-Zip

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 77867
+607%
Celeron N5095 11013

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 348
+178%
Celeron N5095 125

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 1720
+251%
Celeron N5095 490

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 277
+191%
Celeron N5095 95

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 241
Celeron N5095 2936
+1118%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.68 2.57
Integrated graphics card 21.89 5.58
Recency 25 July 2024 11 January 2021
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 665.8% higher aggregate performance score, 292.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has 260% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1463 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.