Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 155 Watt
35.99
+158%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
13.94

Xeon E7-8895 v2 outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by a whopping 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking101532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency21.9747.12
Architecture codenameno dataStrix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores15 (Pentadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3016 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s54 MHz
L3 cache37.5 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8no data
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes32no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 35.99
+158%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 13.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 57165
+158%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22145

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.99 13.94
Recency 1 January 2014 1 October 2024
Physical cores 15 8
Threads 30 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon E7-8895 v2 has a 158.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 87.5% more physical cores and 87.5% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 453.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E7-8895 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-8895 v2
Xeon E7-8895 v2
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 116 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8895 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-8895 v2 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.