Celeron M 575 vs Ryzen AI 7 350
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 7 350 outperforms Celeron M 575 by a whopping 6061% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 574 | 3449 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 54.26 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Krackan Point (2025) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 1 June 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron M 575 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 195 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron M 575 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP8 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron M 575. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron M 575 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron M 575. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 860M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and Celeron M 575.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.17 | 0.23 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 1 June 2008 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 1 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 350 has a 6060.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 575, on the other hand, has 2700% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 575 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
