Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.38
+12.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.30

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking337422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon 780M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 18.38
+12.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 16.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28072
+12.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 24888

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2305
+7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2154

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 10948
+14.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9535

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360
+5.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2229

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275
+3.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 266

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.38 16.30
Recency 13 June 2023 3 May 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has a 12.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 42 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.