Celeron N6211 vs Ryzen 9 8945H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 8945H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
17.25
+1248%

Ryzen 9 8945H outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 1248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4432519
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)Elkhart Lake
Power efficiency16.198.32
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date6 December 2023 (2 years ago)17 July 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 8945H and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 8945H and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 8945H and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 9 8945H 17.25
+1248%
Celeron N6211 1.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 9 8945H 30218
+1246%
Samples: 107
Celeron N6211 2245
Samples: 2

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 8945H 7594
+182%
Celeron N6211 2696

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 8945H 46572
+892%
Celeron N6211 4693

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 9 8945H 2.57
+1832%
Celeron N6211 49.66

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 8945H 29
+1666%
Celeron N6211 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 8945H 2777
+2070%
Celeron N6211 128

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 8945H 284
+273%
Celeron N6211 76

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 9 8945H 15.7
+1502%
Celeron N6211 1

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 8945H 3.28
+238%
Celeron N6211 0.97

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 8945H 159
+1489%
Celeron N6211 10

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 8945H 285
+529%
Celeron N6211 45

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 9 8945H 7542
+932%
Celeron N6211 731

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 8945H 11980
+1319%
Celeron N6211 844

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 8945H 6664
+157%
Celeron N6211 2593

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 8945H 72851
+1733%
Celeron N6211 3974

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 8945H 182
Celeron N6211 3767
+1970%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 8945H 1994
+259%
Celeron N6211 556

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 8945H 309
+246%
Celeron N6211 89

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 9 8945H 265
+319%
Celeron N6211 63

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.25 1.28
Integrated graphics card 16.44 1.26
Recency 6 December 2023 17 July 2022
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 9 8945H has a 1247.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1204.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 8945H is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
Ryzen 9 8945H
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 26 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 8945H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 5 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 9 8945H and Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.