Ryzen 5 7540U vs Ryzen 9 7900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7900
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
30.74
+161%
Ryzen 5 7540U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
11.77

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 5 7540U by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 5 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking133655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency44.7639.78
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date14 January 2023 (1 year ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 5 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size2x 71 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistors13,140 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 5 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 5 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475Vno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 5 7540U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 5 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)AMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 5 7540U.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7900 30.74
+161%
Ryzen 5 7540U 11.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 7900 48832
+161%
Ryzen 5 7540U 18690

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 7900 2857
+37%
Ryzen 5 7540U 2085

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 7900 16834
+112%
Ryzen 5 7540U 7935

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 7900 8339
+13.2%
Ryzen 5 7540U 7365

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 7900 60934
+120%
Ryzen 5 7540U 27647

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 9 7900 19451
+63.1%
Ryzen 5 7540U 11925

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 7900 45
+133%
Ryzen 5 7540U 19

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 7900 4020
+140%
Ryzen 5 7540U 1676

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 7900 315
+19.3%
Ryzen 5 7540U 264

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 7900 3.68
+14.3%
Ryzen 5 7540U 3.22

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 9 7900 21.5
+147%
Ryzen 5 7540U 8.7

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 7900 207
+174%
Ryzen 5 7540U 76

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 7900 356
+57.1%
Ryzen 5 7540U 226

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 9 7900 10154
+92.6%
Ryzen 5 7540U 5273

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 7900 17880
+116%
Ryzen 5 7540U 8296

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 7900 125
Ryzen 5 7540U 413
+230%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 7900 2203
+18.1%
Ryzen 5 7540U 1866

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 7900 7936
+31.4%
Ryzen 5 7540U 6039

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 7900 112881
+219%
Ryzen 5 7540U 35368

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 7900 366
+28%
Ryzen 5 7540U 286

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.74 11.77
Integrated graphics card 4.42 8.33
Recency 14 January 2023 3 May 2023
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 9 7900 has a 161.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7540U, on the other hand, has 88.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7540U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7900 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7540U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 5 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Ryzen 9 7900
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
Ryzen 5 7540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 362 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7900 or Ryzen 5 7540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.