Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Ryzen 9 6900HX

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 9 6900HX
2022
8 cores / 16 threads
16.05

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by a small 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking380334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release dateJanuary 2022 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography6 nm4 nm
Die size208 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP7FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 6900HX 16.05
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 17.04
+6.2%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 6900HX 24826
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26362
+6.2%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by 6% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 6900HX 1983
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2237
+12.8%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by 13% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 6900HX 9557
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10792
+12.9%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by 13% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 6900HX 13274
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+11.3%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by 11% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 6900HX 2231
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+9.4%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by 9% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 6900HX 249
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+8%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX by 8% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.05 17.04
Integrated graphics card 16.93 18.37
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 6900HX and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 373 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 38 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 6900HX or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.