Ryzen 7 6800H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.14
+12.8%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 6800H by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 6800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking345431
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 6800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm6 nm
Die size178 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 6800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP8FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 6800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 6800H are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 6800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 6800H.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 17.14
+12.8%
Ryzen 7 6800H 15.19

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 6800H by 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26515
+12.8%
Ryzen 7 6800H 23498

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 6800H by 13% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2237
+19.4%
Ryzen 7 6800H 1874

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 6800H by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10770
+19.8%
Ryzen 7 6800H 8993

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 6800H by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+5.8%
Ryzen 7 6800H 13958

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 6800H by 6% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+13.4%
Ryzen 7 6800H 2151

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 6800H by 13% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+10.7%
Ryzen 7 6800H 243

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 6800H by 11% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.14 15.19
Integrated graphics card 18.36 17.37
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 6800H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 6800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
Ryzen 7 6800H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 44 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1334 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Ryzen 7 6800H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.