EPYC 7313 vs Ryzen 9 5900HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.03
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.27
+80.1%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900HS by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking489176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.23
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3)Milan (2021)
Release date7 January 2021 (3 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083
Current priceno data$1058 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP6SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 7313.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 14.03
EPYC 7313 25.27
+80.1%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900HS by 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 5900HS 21705
EPYC 7313 39091
+80.1%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900HS by 80% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.03 25.27
Recency 7 January 2021 15 March 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900HS in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 5900HS is a notebook processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 162 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900HS or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.