Xeon Gold 6242R vs Ryzen 9 5900

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
22.31
Xeon Gold 6242R
2020
20 cores / 40 threads, 205 Watt
22.67
+1.6%

Xeon Gold 6242R outperforms Ryzen 9 5900 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking235229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Intel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameVermeer (2020−2024)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,529

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads2440
Base clock speed3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3031
L1 cache768 KB1.25 MB
L2 cache6 MB20 MB
L3 cache64 MB35.75 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,150 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900 22.31
Xeon Gold 6242R 22.67
+1.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900 34400
Xeon Gold 6242R 34963
+1.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.31 22.67
Recency 12 January 2021 24 February 2020
Physical cores 12 20
Threads 24 40
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900 has an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6242R, on the other hand, has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R.

Note that Ryzen 9 5900 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6242R is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon Gold 6242R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900
Ryzen 9 5900
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
Xeon Gold 6242R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 102 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6242R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900 or Xeon Gold 6242R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.