EPYC 7H12 vs Ryzen 9 5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
22.26
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
45.02
+102%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900 by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.2323.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameVermeer (2020−2022)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$304 $1750

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5900 has 156% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads24128
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size81 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,150 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900 22.26
EPYC 7H12 45.02
+102%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900 by 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 5900 34429
EPYC 7H12 69633
+102%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900 by 102% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.26 45.02
Recency 12 January 2021 18 September 2019
Physical cores 12 64
Threads 24 128
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 5900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900
Ryzen 9 5900
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 94 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.