EPYC 7H12 vs Ryzen 7 5800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 5800
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
16.45
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
44.32
+169%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by 169% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking34938
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation36.2322.44
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameVermeer (2020−2022)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date5 November 2020 (3 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$353 $1970

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5800 has 61% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Detailed Specifications

Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size81 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,150 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5800 16.45
EPYC 7H12 44.32
+169%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by 169% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 5800 25842
EPYC 7H12 69633
+169%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by 169% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 16.45 44.32
Recency 5 November 2020 18 September 2019
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 128
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 5800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 230 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5800 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.