Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 9 5900
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms i9-10900F by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 221 | 568 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.06 | 18.20 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vermeer (2020−2022) | Comet Lake (2020) |
| Release date | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 9 5900 has 252% better value for money than i9-10900F.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,150 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Core i9-10900F by 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Core i9-10900F by 72% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Core i9-10900F by 24% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Core i9-10900F by 26% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.24 | 12.92 |
| Recency | 12 January 2021 | 30 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 10 |
| Threads | 24 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Ryzen 9 5900 has a 72.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 9 5900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900F in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900 and Core i9-10900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
