Celeron N6211 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
11.93
+746%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41

Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 746% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 4900HS and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6452198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Elkhart Lake
Power efficiency32.2620.53
Architecture codenameRenoir (Zen 2) (2020)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date7 March 2020 (4 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 4900HS and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C70 °C
Number of transistors9800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 4900HS and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-4266DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 11.93
+746%
Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 18943
+744%
Celeron N6211 2245

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 5866
+118%
Celeron N6211 2696

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 37938
+708%
Celeron N6211 4693

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 3.28
+1414%
Celeron N6211 49.66

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 18
+1004%
Celeron N6211 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 1863
+1355%
Celeron N6211 128

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 193
+154%
Celeron N6211 76

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 2.23
+130%
Celeron N6211 0.97

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 11.2
+1043%
Celeron N6211 1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 4900HS 106
+960%
Celeron N6211 10

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 4900HS 223
+393%
Celeron N6211 45

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 4548
+522%
Celeron N6211 731

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 4900HS 7675
+809%
Celeron N6211 844

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 4900HS 297
Celeron N6211 3767
+1168%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 4900HS 1218
+119%
Celeron N6211 556

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 4900HS 4634
+78.7%
Celeron N6211 2593

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 4900HS 48577
+1122%
Celeron N6211 3974

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.93 1.41
Integrated graphics card 9.04 1.39
Recency 7 March 2020 17 July 2022
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 9 4900HS has a 746.1% higher aggregate performance score, 550.4% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 4900HS is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 4900HS and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 146 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 4900HS or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.