i7-13700TE vs Ryzen 9 4900H

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 4900H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.51
Core i7-13700TE
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 35 Watt
15.10
+20.7%

Core i7-13700TE outperforms Ryzen 9 4900H by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking630487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency25.3539.34
Architecture codenameRenoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date16 March 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache512 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size156 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors9800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP61700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)Intel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 4900H 12.51
i7-13700TE 15.10
+20.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 4900H 19150
i7-13700TE 23113
+20.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.51 15.10
Integrated graphics card 9.02 6.15
Recency 16 March 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 9 4900H has 46.7% faster integrated GPU, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

i7-13700TE, on the other hand, has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-13700TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 4900H in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 4900H is a notebook processor while Core i7-13700TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 4900H and Core i7-13700TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H
Intel Core i7-13700TE
Core i7-13700TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 239 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate Core i7-13700TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 4900H or Core i7-13700TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.