Xeon E7-8867 v3 vs Ryzen 9 3950X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
24.39
+4.9%
Xeon E7-8867 v3
2015
16 cores / 32 threads, 165 Watt
23.24

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E7-8867 v3 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking206220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency21.9813.33
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Haswell-EX (2015)
Release date11 June 2019 (5 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rateno data9.6 GT/s
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB45 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm22 nm
Die size2 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2160 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAEno data46 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3950X 24.39
+4.9%
Xeon E7-8867 v3 23.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3950X 38735
+5%
Xeon E7-8867 v3 36908

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.39 23.24
Recency 11 June 2019 1 June 2015
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 165 Watt

Ryzen 9 3950X has a 4.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3.

Note that Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-8867 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon E7-8867 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Xeon E7-8867 v3
Xeon E7-8867 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 713 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8867 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3950X or Xeon E7-8867 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.