Celeron 600 vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 269 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 20.56 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | no data |
Power efficiency | 18.51 | no data |
Architecture codename | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Timna |
Release date | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 24 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 0.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 768 KB | 32 KB |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 128 KB |
L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | no data | 129 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | 370S |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 600 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | Intel i752 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
Threads | 24 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 30 Watt |
Ryzen 9 3900X has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 600, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 600. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Celeron 600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.