FX-8350 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.28
+352%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4931685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.87
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency18.451.14
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date13 June 2023 (2 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB8192 KB
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size178 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP8AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and FX-8350.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 15.28
+352%
FX-8350 3.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26861
+353%
Samples: 175
FX-8350 5936
Samples: 19921

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2221
+355%
FX-8350 488

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10568
+432%
FX-8350 1988

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+122%
FX-8350 6648

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+284%
FX-8350 636

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+177%
FX-8350 97

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.28 3.38
Recency 13 June 2023 23 October 2012
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 352.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-8350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while FX-8350 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD FX-8350
FX-8350

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 65 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 4117 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and FX-8350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.