EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4364P outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 502 | 335 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 45.65 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 18.46 | 7.97 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $399 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and EPYC 4364P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.29 | 19.81 |
| Integrated graphics card | 15.65 | 1.73 |
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 21 May 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has 804.6% faster integrated GPU, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has a 29.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.
The AMD EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while EPYC 4364P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
