A10-9620P vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 972% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 507 | 2371 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 18.50 | 4.03 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 January 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3100 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.22 | 1.42 |
| Integrated graphics card | 16.52 | 2.24 |
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 1 January 2017 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 971.8% higher aggregate performance score, 637.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
A10-9620P, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-9620P in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
