A10-9620P vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 537% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A10-9620P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 689 | 1987 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) | Bristol Ridge |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 19 April 2022 (2 years ago) | 1 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $886 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 3100 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP6 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A10-9620P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A10-9620P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A10-9620P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms A10-9620P by 537% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms A10-9620P by 535% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms A10-9620P by 209% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms A10-9620P by 387% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.51 | 1.65 |
| Integrated graphics card | 9.08 | 2.45 |
| Recency | 19 April 2022 | 1 January 2017 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
