Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.49
+37.1%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking515725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesRembrandt (Zen 3+)Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameRembrandt U (Zen 3+)Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2)
Release date20 April 2022 (2 years ago)7 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache4 MB4 MB
L3 cache16 MB8 MB
Chip lithography6 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7FP6
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 13.49
+37.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9.84

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 20863
+37.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15218

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 37% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1583
+17.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1344

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 18% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 7122
+38.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 5127

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 39% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 6238
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8379
+34.3%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z by 34% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 36959
+25%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 29574

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 25% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 7.9
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 3.95
+100%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 100% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 23
+46.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 16

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 46% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1992
+41.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1410

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 41% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 233
+28.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 181

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 29% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 2.87
+35.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 2.12

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 35% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 7.7
+9.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 7.1

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 9% in TrueCrypt AES.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.49 9.84
Integrated graphics card 17.37 7.40
Recency 20 April 2022 7 May 2020
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 128 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z or Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.