Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 758 | 1553 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Rembrandt (Zen 3+) | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 17.25 | 11.27 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 20 April 2022 (3 years ago) | 8 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.75 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP7 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.40 | 3.99 |
| Integrated graphics card | 8.68 | 3.69 |
| Recency | 20 April 2022 | 8 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z has a 185.7% higher aggregate performance score, 135.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
