Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads
15.81
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads
16.53
+4.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking388354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money20.0245.15
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameCezanne PRO (Zen 3)ZEN+ (2018−2020)
Release date1 June 2021 (2 years ago)3 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649
Current price$638 $190 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 126% better value for money than Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G.

Technical specs

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB32 MB
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die size180 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s93.867 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 15.81
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.53
+4.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 24449
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25557
+4.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 5% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1942
+53.9%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1262

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 54% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 8213
+14.3%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7186

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 6432
+19%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 5407

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 37998
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 46015
+21.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 3.69
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 3.03
+21.8%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 22% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 22
+26.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 18

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 27% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1956
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 2628
+34.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 34% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 241
+35.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 178

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 35% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 2.87
+46.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1.96

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 46% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 11.1
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.2
+45.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 46% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 7011
+50.2%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 4669

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 50% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 250
+19.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 209

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by 20% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 113
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 131
+15.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 16% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 15.81 16.53
Recency 1 June 2021 3 October 2018
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 140 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 42 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G or Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.