Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads
15.81
+39.5%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by a considerable 40% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking391623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.0326.76
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameCezanne PRO (Zen 3)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date1 June 2021 (2 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329
Current price$638 $162 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700X has 34% better value for money than Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.35 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die size180 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMESSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 15.81
+39.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 11.33

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 40% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 24449
+39.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 17532

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 39% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1942
+55.9%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1246

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 56% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 8222
+34.7%
Ryzen 7 2700X 6105

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 35% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 6432
+22.4%
Ryzen 7 2700X 5256

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 22% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 37998
+9.3%
Ryzen 7 2700X 34763

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 3.69
Ryzen 7 2700X 3.48
+6%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 6% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 22
+19%
Ryzen 7 2700X 19

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 19% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1956
+11%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1762

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 11% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 241
+37.2%
Ryzen 7 2700X 176

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 37% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 2.87
+47.2%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1.95

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 47% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 11.1
+4.7%
Ryzen 7 2700X 10.6

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 5% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 7011
+46.7%
Ryzen 7 2700X 4779

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 47% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 250
+10.1%
Ryzen 7 2700X 227

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 10% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 113
+8.3%
Ryzen 7 2700X 105

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by 8% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.81 11.33
Recency 1 June 2021 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 142 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2709 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.