Ryzen Embedded V2516 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.96
+75.8%
Ryzen Embedded V2516
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.51

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2516 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking495914
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency20.9951.73
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache512 KB384 KB
L2 cache4 MB3 MB
L3 cache32 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size74 mm2156 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s68.269 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics 384SP

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 14.96
+75.8%
Ryzen Embedded V2516 8.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 22899
+75.9%
Ryzen Embedded V2516 13016

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.96 8.51
Recency 30 September 2019 10 November 2020
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has a 75.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen Embedded V2516, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V2516 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516
Ryzen Embedded V2516

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 399 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2516 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 or Ryzen Embedded V2516, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.