Solo T1400 vs Ryzen 7 8700G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Core Solo T1400 by a whopping 12225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 347 | 3476 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 48.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 11.73 | 0.23 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (1 year ago) | January 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 8700G and Core Solo T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.1625V - 1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 8700G and Core Solo T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and Core Solo T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, NX-Bit, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XDNA2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 8700G and Core Solo T1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and Core Solo T1400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and Core Solo T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and Core Solo T1400.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.72 | 0.16 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 27 Watt |
Ryzen 7 8700G has a 12225% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
Solo T1400, on the other hand, has 140.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1400 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 8700G is a desktop processor while Core Solo T1400 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
