A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 7 8700G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 8700G
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
20.49
+3918%

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms A4-3310MX by a whopping 3918% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 8700G and A4-3310MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2482773
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.59no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Architecture codenamePhoenixLlano (2011−2012)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$299 $136

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 8700G and A4-3310MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size178 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors25,000 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 8700G and A4-3310MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FS1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and A4-3310MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and A4-3310MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and A4-3310MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon HD 6480G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and A4-3310MX.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 8700G 20.49
+3918%
A4-3310MX 0.51

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms A4-3310MX by 3918% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 8700G 31698
+3953%
A4-3310MX 782

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms A4-3310MX by 3953% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 8700G 2685
+820%
A4-3310MX 292

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms A4-3310MX by 820% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 8700G 14006
+2690%
A4-3310MX 502

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms A4-3310MX by 2690% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.49 0.51
Integrated graphics card 18.35 0.66
Recency 8 January 2024 14 June 2011
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 7 8700G is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3310MX in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 8700G is a desktop processor while A4-3310MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 8700G and A4-3310MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G
AMD A4-3310MX
A4-3310MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 136 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 26 votes

Rate A4-3310MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 8700G or A4-3310MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.