Ryzen 7 7840S vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.97
+85.4%
Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.09

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking168465
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency29.4140.80
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 40-core GPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) 27.97
+85.4%
Ryzen 7 7840S 15.09

CrossMark Overall

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) 2255
+36.3%
Ryzen 7 7840S 1655

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) 353
+42.6%
Ryzen 7 7840S 248

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) 25760
+104%
Ryzen 7 7840S 12598

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) 3880
+48.9%
Ryzen 7 7840S 2605

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.97 15.09
Recency 30 October 2024 5 January 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 85.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 7840S, on the other hand, has 157.1% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7840S in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 25 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Ryzen 7 7840S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.