Celeron M P4600 vs Ryzen 7 7840H
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 7840H outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a whopping 3016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 451 | 3058 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 19.19 | 0.62 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | January 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7840H and Celeron M P4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 2500 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7840H and Celeron M P4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP8 | PGA988 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Celeron M P4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 7840H and Celeron M P4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Celeron M P4600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Celeron M P4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5600 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Celeron M P4600.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.89 | 0.51 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
Ryzen 7 7840H has a 3015.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
