i9-10800F vs Ryzen 7 7735H
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 467 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 40.67 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) | Comet Lake (2020) |
| Release date | 1 April 2023 (1 year ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.75 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 208 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP7 | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR4-2933 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2023 | 30 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 10 |
| Threads | 16 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7735H has an age advantage of 2 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
i9-10800F, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 7735H is a notebook processor while Core i9-10800F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i9-10800F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
