EPYC 8434PN vs Ryzen 7 7700X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 230 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 97 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 43.60 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 20.42 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 29 August 2022 (2 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $3,150 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 71+122 mm | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 6,570 million | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 August 2022 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 48 |
| Threads | 16 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 155 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7700X has 47.6% lower power consumption.
EPYC 8434PN, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 7 7700X is a desktop processor while EPYC 8434PN is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7700X and EPYC 8434PN, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
