Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Ryzen 7 5800

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5800 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	359	2051
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	38.25	2.80
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Ryzen 7	Core 2 Quad (Desktop)
Architecture codename	Vermeer (2020−2022)	Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date	5 November 2020 (3 years ago)	no data
Current price	$320	$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5800 has 1266% better value for money than Core 2 Quad Q9550.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5800 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	16	4
Base clock speed	3.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	4.6 GHz	2.83 GHz
Bus support	no data	1333 MHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512K (per core)	12288 KB
L3 cache	32 MB	no data
Chip lithography	7 nm, 12 nm	45 nm
Die size	81 mm2	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	95 °C	no data
Number of transistors	4,150 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5800 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM4	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
AVX	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-3200	DDR1,DDR2,DDR3
Maximum memory size	128 GB	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	51.196 GB/s	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and Core 2 Quad Q9550.

PCIe version

4.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 1005% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	16.68	1.51
Physical cores	8	4
Threads	16	4
Chip lithography	7 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5800 and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---