Athlon X4 880K vs Ryzen 7 4700U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 4700U
2020
8 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
8.44
+265%
Athlon X4 880K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.31

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms Athlon X4 880K by a whopping 265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 4700U and Athlon X4 880K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8961797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency53.032.29
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)December 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 4700U and Athlon X4 880K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.8 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache512 KB256K
L2 cache4 MB4 MB
L3 cache8 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm28 nm
Die size156 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 4700U and Athlon X4 880K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 4700U and Athlon X4 880K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 4700U and Athlon X4 880K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 4700U and Athlon X4 880K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 7no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 4700U and Athlon X4 880K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 4700U 8.44
+265%
Athlon X4 880K 2.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 4700U 13363
+265%
Athlon X4 880K 3659

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 4700U 1356
+127%
Athlon X4 880K 598

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 4700U 4918
+165%
Athlon X4 880K 1855

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.44 2.31
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 7 4700U has a 265.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 4700U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 880K in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 4700U is a notebook processor while Athlon X4 880K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 4700U and Athlon X4 880K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Athlon X4 880K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1329 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 50 votes

Rate Athlon X4 880K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 4700U or Athlon X4 880K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.