Xeon E-2488 vs Ryzen 7 3700U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.67
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.99
+307%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by a whopping 307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1305322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.70
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency28.3918.23
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 10N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3700U 4.67
Xeon E-2488 18.99
+307%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 3700U 7145
Xeon E-2488 29060
+307%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.67 18.99
Recency 6 January 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 7 3700U has 533.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has a 306.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 3700U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 3700U is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1444 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3700U or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.