Atom x7433RE vs Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1711 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.75 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 29 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $63 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.35 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 April 2019 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 9 Watt |
Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Atom x7433RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary is a desktop processor while Atom x7433RE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary and Atom x7433RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
