EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen 7 2700E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700E
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.48
EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.29
+367%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700E by a whopping 367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700E and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking75741
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.8212.13
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date10 September 2018 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,860
Current price$281 $3300 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700E has 6% better value for money than EPYC 75F3.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700E and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache768 KB2 MB
L2 cache4 MB16 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm+
Die size213 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700E and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700E 9.48
EPYC 75F3 44.29
+367%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700E by 367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 2700E 14657
EPYC 75F3 68505
+367%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700E by 367% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.48 44.29
Recency 10 September 2018 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700E in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 2700E is a desktop processor while EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700E and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Ryzen 7 2700E
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 32 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700E or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.