i5-9600KF vs Ryzen 7 2700E

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700E
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.23
+37.4%
Core i5-9600KF
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
6.72

Ryzen 7 2700E outperforms Core i5-9600KF by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8271027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.34
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Core i5
Power efficiency13.446.69
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date19 September 2018 (6 years ago)8 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads166
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2837
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700E 9.23
+37.4%
i5-9600KF 6.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 2700E 14657
+37.3%
i5-9600KF 10677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.23 6.72
Recency 19 September 2018 8 January 2019
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 6
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700E has a 37.4% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

i5-9600KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

The Ryzen 7 2700E is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9600KF in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-9600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Core i5-9600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 34 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1156 votes

Rate Core i5-9600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700E or Core i5-9600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.