Athlon II X3 460 vs Ryzen 7 1700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
10.16
+682%

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Athlon II X3 460 by a whopping 682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700X and Athlon II X3 460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7592258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.205.49
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Rana (2009−2011)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)3 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X3 460 has 31% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700X and Athlon II X3 460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads163
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache768 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16384 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm2169 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700X and Athlon II X3 460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Athlon II X3 460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA3-
AVX+-
XFR+-
SenseMI+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Athlon II X3 460 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Athlon II X3 460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Athlon II X3 460.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700X 10.16
+682%
Athlon II X3 460 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700X 15668
+680%
Athlon II X3 460 2008

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 1700X 1100
+173%
Athlon II X3 460 403

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 1700X 5636
+424%
Athlon II X3 460 1076

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.16 1.30
Recency 2 March 2017 3 May 2011
Physical cores 8 3
Threads 16 3
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm

Ryzen 7 1700X has a 681.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 1700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X3 460 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700X and Athlon II X3 460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 1700X
AMD Athlon II X3 460
Athlon II X3 460

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 723 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 82 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700X or Athlon II X3 460, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.