Atom C3558 vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.57
+510%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Atom C3558 by a whopping 510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7512023
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.240.52
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Atom
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$86
Current price$237 (0.7x MSRP)$424 (4.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 1700 has 1485% better value for money than Atom C3558.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache768 KB224 KB
L2 cache4096 KB8 MB
L3 cache16384 KB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt16 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Statusno dataLaunched
XFR-no data
SenseMI+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory size64 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558.

PCIe versionn/a3
PCI Express lanes2012
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data12
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data12
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 9.57
+510%
Atom C3558 1.57

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Atom C3558 by 510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 1700 14808
+510%
Atom C3558 2426

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Atom C3558 by 510% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.57 1.57
Recency 2 March 2017 15 August 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Cost $329 $86
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 16 Watt

The Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3558 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while Atom C3558 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom C3558, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Atom C3558
Atom C3558

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1454 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Atom C3558 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or Atom C3558, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.