Athlon X2 L310 vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking751not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 72x AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Conesus (2009)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)10 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data
Current price$237 (0.7x MSRP)$9.79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache768 KB256 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cache16384 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4BGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection
AES-NI+no data
FMAFMA3no data
AVX+no data
VirusProtectno data+
XFR-no data
SenseMI+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310.

PCIe versionn/ano data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 1700 14808
+4401%
Athlon X2 L310 329

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 4401% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 1700 1009
+770%
Athlon X2 L310 116

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 770% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 1700 5120
+2473%
Athlon X2 L310 199

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 2473% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 1700 4419
+348%
Athlon X2 L310 987

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 348% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1700 29330
+1579%
Athlon X2 L310 1747

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 1579% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1700 8335
+862%
Athlon X2 L310 866

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by 862% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 1700 6
+1639%
Athlon X2 L310 104.35

Athlon X2 L310 outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 1639% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2017 10 September 2009
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 13 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while Athlon X2 L310 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon X2 L310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
AMD Athlon X2 L310
Athlon X2 L310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1454 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Athlon X2 L310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or Athlon X2 L310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.