Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 250 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 679 | 696 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 5 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 MB + 16 MB | 8 MB + 16 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.53 | 12.31 |
| Integrated graphics card | 13.01 | 16.50 |
| Recency | 5 January 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 PRO 250, on the other hand, has 26.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
