Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.39
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 54 Watt
14.20
+223%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1388532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency27.8725.04
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2019)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date8 January 2018 (7 years ago)5 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB6 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 4.39
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 14.20
+223%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 7038
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22778
+224%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 836
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2240
+168%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 2465
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 8579
+248%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 3183
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 8863
+178%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.39 14.20
Integrated graphics card 3.66 12.72
Recency 8 January 2018 5 January 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 54 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U has 260% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, on the other hand, has a 223.5% higher aggregate performance score, 247.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 44 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.