Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
10.30
+6.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
9.66

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking789829
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency65.4026.29
Architecture codenameRembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+) (2022)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date19 April 2022 (2 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm7 nm
Die size208 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare Vega 7 and Radeon 660M
AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 10.30
+6.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE 9.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 16529
+6.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE 15503

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 1736
+15.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE 1506

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 6638
+16.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE 5677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.30 9.66
Integrated graphics card 7.07 6.43
Recency 19 April 2022 21 July 2020
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U has a 6.6% higher aggregate performance score, 10% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 42 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 85 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.