Atom Z612 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 715 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+) (2022) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 20 April 2022 (2 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 900 MHz - 1500 MHz (1 core) |
| Bus type | no data | cDMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 9 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 208 mm2 | 65.2526 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 1.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 3.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 660M | PowerVR SGX535 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 April 2022 | 4 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 1 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U has an age advantage of 11 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z612, on the other hand, has 2700% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Atom Z612, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
