Atom x7213RE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 759 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.82 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Renoir (2020−2023) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $42 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 July 2020 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Atom x7213RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 622.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop processor while Atom x7213RE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Atom x7213RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
