i7-1068G7 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1303 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
| Release date | 8 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | OPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 21 | 23 |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP5 | Intel BGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 59.732 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.50 | 5.44 |
| Recency | 8 April 2019 | 1 August 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U has 86.7% lower power consumption.
i7-1068G7, on the other hand, has 20.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Core i7-1068G7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
