Celeron J4115 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.42
+162%
Celeron J4115
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.69

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Celeron J4115 by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13272047
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Gemini Lake
Power efficiency27.8915.99
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Gemini Lake (2019)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes126
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 4.42
+162%
Celeron J4115 1.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 7019
+161%
Celeron J4115 2687

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 624
+156%
Celeron J4115 244

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 142
+101%
Celeron J4115 71

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2824
+98.8%
Celeron J4115 1421

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 796
Celeron J4115 2515
+216%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 863
+116%
Celeron J4115 399

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 3474
+57.9%
Celeron J4115 2200

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 16221
+113%
Celeron J4115 7614

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 142
+73.9%
Celeron J4115 82

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.42 1.69
Integrated graphics card 4.50 0.87
Recency 8 April 2019 4 November 2019
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U has a 161.5% higher aggregate performance score, 417.2% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J4115, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4115 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a notebook processor while Celeron J4115 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Celeron J4115, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Intel Celeron J4115
Celeron J4115

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 142 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 135 votes

Rate Celeron J4115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U or Celeron J4115, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.