EPYC 7313P vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7313P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE by a whopping 407% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7313P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1108 | 159 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.87 | 19.88 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD EPYC |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2020) | Milan (2021) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (4 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $913 |
| Current price | $169 | $1252 (1.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 7313P has 43% better value for money than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 204.795 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7313P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7313P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE by 407% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7313P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE by 407% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
EPYC 7313P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE by 24% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
EPYC 7313P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE by 185% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.36 | 27.18 |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 155 Watt |
The EPYC 7313P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE and EPYC 7313P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
